The news, with a bit of spin

Zverev beats Norrie for a third time this year, and the C30.4 knows that kind of rival

Alexander Zverev, world No. 2 and top seed in Beijing with Jannik Sinner absent, beat Cameron Norrie 7-6(1), 6-4. He had already beaten him at the Australian Open and in Cincinnati, and he now meets Juncheng Shang for a place in the quarter-finals.

Céline, a club player, stands ready where her opponent's serve will land, under a flickering tube light, holding her folder of statistics.

Zverev beat Norrie 7-6(1), 6-4 on Thursday in Beijing. Third time this season, after the Australian Open and Cincinnati. I look at that 7-1 tie-break and I recognise the pattern: when you already know your opponent inside out, you reach the decider with clear intentions. That tie-break, I win it. Not every time, but I win it.

I have a Norrie too. A woman from a neighbouring club, met three times in interclubs (Belgium’s weekend team league) this year. Three times, same court 4, same neon buzzing in the second set. The third time, I knew where she would serve before she did. I lost anyway, but that was the strings.

The most interesting part comes after the match. In his press conference, Zverev defended best-of-five sets at the Grand Slams. He said: “Physically, it’s one of the most demanding tests a player can face.” He also cited record audiences at the Australian Open and the US Open, according to Tennis Actu.

Five sets. For us, on Sundays, it’s two sets and a match tie-break, and the clubhouse bar closes at one. If we played five, I honestly think my level would show. My problem is the start. My season really starts in May, and my matches around the third set.

Céline, over five sets you would have lost in five sets. It’s mathematical, I’ve calculated it.

Jean-Pol Vandenbroeck · the pundit, fictional character

Zverev also spoke about Novak Djokovic, who favours the change, with a “maybe” about advancing age. That, I won’t comment on: at my club, whoever talks about age at the bar buys the round.

Zverev’s next opponent: Juncheng Shang, for a place in the quarter-finals. Him, I’ve never met in interclubs, so I can’t yet tell you where he’ll serve. Give me three Sundays.

It’s true, we checked: Tennis Actu.

Did you enjoy this dispatch?

Get the dispatches by e-mail

The dispatches worth your time, by e-mail. No ads, unsubscribe in one click.

Also the mail from our other titles:

Our columnists’ reactions are fictional; the facts and real quotes are sourced above.

The other angles in French

The editor-in-chief chose this one: « Céline regarde le fait du circuit avec sa lunette de club, sans prendre parti dans la pique Zverev-Djokovic, et ses chutes tiennent seules. B est drôle mais son titre ambigu le rend inexact. »

Zverev défend les cinq sets en Grand Chelem, Jean-Pol en revendique la paternité

Après sa victoire 7-6(1), 6-4 sur Cameron Norrie à l'ATP 500 de Pékin, Alexander Zverev s'est opposé en conférence de presse au passage des Grands Chelems au meilleur des trois sets. Il a cité les audiences records de l'Open d'Australie et de l'US Open.

  • Funniness 3/5
  • Faithfulness 4/5
  • Voice 3/5
  • Retweet 2/5
  • Good nature 3/5

The editor-in-chief’s comment Le Kitzbühel à géométrie variable fonctionne, mais l'interclub va à Céline, pas à Jean-Pol, et la pique « celui qui veut raccourcir n'est pas celui qui gagne en cinq » donne tort à Djokovic, qui ne partagera pas.

Read this angle →

MaximeThe Intern

Zverev refuse les Grands Chelems en trois sets, Maxime découvre qu’il en existe cinq

Vainqueur de Cameron Norrie 7-6(1), 6-4 à l'ATP 500 de Pékin, Alexander Zverev s'est dit opposé au passage des Grands Chelems au meilleur des trois sets, estimant qu'on les gagne difficilement précisément parce qu'on y joue en cinq.

  • Funniness 4/5
  • Faithfulness 3/5
  • Voice 4/5
  • Retweet 4/5
  • Good nature 4/5

The editor-in-chief’s comment Le filet « vérifié » et « la même réponse, mais en mieux » sont vraiment candides, mais le titre « il en existe cinq » se lit comme cinq Grands Chelems et devient faux.

Read this angle →