The news, with a bit of spin

Zverev says Medvedev “never left”: Maxime looks for where he came back from

Asked before the Rolex Paris Masters about a comeback for the generation of Medvedev and Tsitsipas, Alexander Zverev answered that Medvedev had never left, is back in the top 5 and should stay there.

Maxime, stagiaire, carnet en main, scrute perplexe l'entrée vide d'un tunnel de joueurs sous un panneau « Retour ? ».

Silly question, but how do you come back when you never left? A journalist asked Alexander Zverev, before the Rolex Paris Masters, whether the generation of Daniil Medvedev and Stefanos Tsitsipas was finally coming back to the front. Zverev answered: “I think Daniil never left.”

So I looked into it. Where was he? According to Zverev, he had a slightly worse season last year, finished “what, ninth or tenth in the world?” He said it from memory. On the 7:32 train, I explained this to my neighbour. She asked how many players there are in total. Lots. Ninth or tenth, then. To me, someone who is ninth out of lots is there. Quite far ahead, even.

And now Medvedev is back in the top 5, and Zverev thinks he will stay there. I note that the words “back again” are used for someone who hadn’t left. I checked, and actually nobody knows.

Zverev also said: “I think you have to be careful when you say that players have declined or are losing steam, or something like that, because I think we’ve forgotten how truly excellent a tennis player Daniil is and what results he is capable of getting.” He has respect for him and sees him doing great things again over the next four or five years.

As for Tsitsipas, he thinks he has had a few more problems, but that he can play excellent tennis. I asked the newsroom whether he had left, too.

Left, came back, it’s the same movement seen from two sides of the net, you know.

Jean-Pol Vandenbroeck · the pundit, fictional character

I wrote that in my notebook, I don’t understand it yet. Anyway, I still have a lot to learn.

It’s true, we checked: We Love Tennis.

Did you enjoy this dispatch?

Get the dispatches by e-mail

The dispatches worth your time, by e-mail. No ads, unsubscribe in one click.

Also the mail from our other titles:

Our columnists’ reactions are fictional; the facts and real quotes are sourced above.

The other angles in French

The editor-in-chief chose this one: « B est la seule dépêche à la fois drôle et irréprochable sur les faits : la candeur de Maxime suffit à faire tout le travail. A est plus mordante, mais elle ajoute un fait hors noyau. »

Zverev assure que Medvedev « n’est jamais parti », Jean-Pol non plus d’ailleurs

En conférence de presse d'avant-tournoi au Rolex Paris Masters, Alexander Zverev, présenté comme nouveau numéro 1 mondial, a défendu Daniil Medvedev, qu'il voit rester dans le top 5. Il juge que Stefanos Tsitsipas a eu un peu plus de problèmes.

  • Funniness 4/5
  • Faithfulness 3/5
  • Voice 5/5
  • Retweet 4/5
  • Good nature 4/5

The editor-in-chief’s comment La mauvaise foi fonctionne très bien (« fini, au sens de terminé de se reposer », « cinquante pour cent de chances »), mais le revers à une main de Tsitsipas est un fait absent du noyau.

Read this angle →

MoniqueThe Nostalgic

Zverev répond que Medvedev « n’est jamais parti » à qui voulait son retour

En conférence d'avant-tournoi au Rolex Paris Masters, un journaliste a demandé à Alexander Zverev si la génération de Medvedev et Tsitsipas revenait enfin. Zverev a répondu que Medvedev n'était jamais parti.

  • Funniness 3/5
  • Faithfulness 3/5
  • Voice 4/5
  • Retweet 3/5
  • Good nature 4/5

The editor-in-chief’s comment La parabole du cousin derrière la haie est douce, mais « quand il veut » déforme « capable », et la chute tape sur le journaliste plutôt que de revenir à Monique.

Read this angle →